ts_dlg-dcl.md — Tolerance Specification (v7.0)

File: ts_dlg.dcl
Version: v7.0
Category: Dialog Definitions
Size: 5.7 KB (173 lines)

Note

AI Tolerance Manager

Tolerance specification with v7.0 AI standards verification, cost-impact analysis, and automated inspection forms.

v7.0 Enhancements

  • ? AI standards verification (PCI/ACI compliance checks)

  • ? Cost-impact calculator (tighter tolerance = higher cost)

  • ? Digital inspection forms (QC checklists auto-generated)

  • ? Statistical tracking (actual vs specified tolerances)

  • ? 3D tolerance zones (visualization of acceptable variation)

AI Standards Verification

User sets tolerance: Width ±1/8"

AI checks:
"PCI MNL-117 standard: ±1/4" typical"
"?? Your spec (±1/8") is 2× tighter than standard"
"Cost impact: +8-12% fabrication"
"Reason for tighter tolerance?"

User: "Critical fit condition"
AI: "? Documented. Will flag for QC priority."

AI ensures realistic specifications
Prevents over-tolerance (cost waste)
Prevents under-tolerance (fit issues)

Cost-Impact Calculator

Tolerance vs Cost:

Standard (±1/4"):
Fabrication: $5,000/panel (baseline)
Rejection rate: 2%

Tight (±1/8"):
Fabrication: $5,400/panel (+8%)
Rejection rate: 5% (harder to meet)
Net cost: +8% fab + 3% rework = +11%

Very tight (±1/16"):
Fabrication: $6,000/panel (+20%)
Rejection rate: 12% (very difficult)
Net cost: +20% fab + 10% rework = +30%

AI shows: "Tight tolerance costs $400 more per panel"
"100 panels: +$40,000 total"
"Is precision worth the cost?"

Digital Inspection Forms

Auto-Generated QC:

Panel P-105 QC Checklist:

Dimensional:
? Width: 12'-0" ±1/8" (measured: _____)
? Height: 10'-0" ±1/4" (measured: _____)
? Thickness: 6" ±1/4" (measured: _____)
? Squareness: 1/8" per foot (measured: _____)

Openings:
? Door 1: 3'-0" ±1/8" (measured: _____)
? Window 1: 4'-0" ±1/8" (measured: _____)

Embeds:
? Weld plate X: ±1/2" (measured: _____)
? Lift insert 1: ±1/2" (measured: _____)

Inspector: _____ Date: _____ Status: Pass/Fail

AI generates customized form per panel
QR code links to digital submission

Statistical Tracking

Actual Performance:

Project tolerance analysis (200 panels):

Dimension: Width
Specified: ±1/4"
Actual average: ±0.15" (within spec ?)
Std deviation: 0.08"
Worst case: +0.22" (still within ±1/4" ?)

AI notes: "Fabricator consistently meets spec"
"Consider: Tighten spec to ±1/8" for future projects"

Data-driven tolerance refinement!

3D Tolerance Zones

Visualization:

3D model shows:
- Nominal geometry (blue solid)
- Tolerance zone (green transparent envelope)
- As-built measurement (red points)

Example: Panel width tolerance ±1/4"
Green zone: 11'-11-3/4" to 12'-0-1/4"
Measured: 12'-0-1/8" (inside zone ?)

Visual pass/fail immediately obvious

Enhancement Status: ? v7.0 ENHANCED [32/38]

End of Document